Search results tell you how many results you will view on the page. Great for a quick reference but also can let you know when the system has loaded the new results. Down to the small details, when a user marks a program as "favorite", the heart will fill in white letting the user know this program has been added to their favorites. They can easily access their favorites in the left sidebar.

Navigation icons are easily recognizable because they represent real world objects and are good signifiers for where the button navigates.

Also, the new title of the page "Book Your New Clinical Experience" not only lets users know what the purpose of the page is, but does so in familiar language.

Sort feature allows users to sort the programs based on criteria that is most important to them, like price point. Since most of these medical students are in the beginning of their careers, things like price point are of importance when deciding to invest in their career.

In the previous design, the filter buttons were not consistent in style. That could cause a lot of confusion on the purpose of the buttons. This design really simplifies the filtering process by having all of the filters in one place and with the same color and style.

Error prevention in this static image can be shown through the date picker feature. There is clear verbiage in grey to let users know to enter a date. In the real product, the date picker will not allow a user to choose a date in the past, and won't allow a user to choose an end date that happens before the inputted start date.

Heart icon in the placement cards allow users to know whether or not they favored a program. They can click on favorites in the new sidebar (which also has the same heart icon) and easily locate a running list of programs that they favored, all in one spot. All of this is helpful so users won't have to instead remember which programs they liked and which they did not.

Map toggle allows users to easily access a map feature to more easily visualize the location of available programs. This is especially useful for the type of user that engages with the AMO marketplace because these users are international. Having the map for international users will allow them to see how far apart proposed programs might be in a country that might be unfamiliar to them.

Another example of flexibility is the sidebar which can be collapsed to allow for more room on the page to view another set of program results per row of results.

Keeping with the tiles from the previous design, I rounded out the edges more and created a drop shadow to really modernize the look of the tiles. The tiles are cleanly laid out, with key tags that help users determine whether a program suits their criteria.

The sidebar is very organized, utilizing the same contents as the top navigation bar from the previous design. Having two navigation bars is confusing, and so I eliminated that from the previous design. Having the sidebar be collapsible allows for users to focus on one task at once if needed, and gives users more space for navigating the search page.

Lastly, I modernized the harsh colors from the previous design to allow users to get a better sense of brand identity.

When users decide to filter, they can utilize a set of check boxes and can easily get feedback on whether a box has been checked. Unlike in the previous design, users will be able to use multiple filters at once and easily uncheck filters that no longer suit their criteria.

Clearly laid out on the side navigation bar is an option for help. Having the help here will allow users, no matter where they are on the page, to navigate to find help and learn more about how to utilize the application.

There were a lot of limitations for this heuristic evaluation given it was a design challenge without much knowledge of the internal system, but overall I learned a lot about key evaluation tools that I can access as a designer if I have limited research resources.

In order to improve my design process for this design challenge, I'd need a few things:
‍
1. Clarification on users and their user journey. Due to this being a design challenge prior to my employment, I didn't have in depth knowledge of key users, which is actually one of the most important parts of UX.
‍
2. Clarify design system guidelines. I changed the colors from the original design because I wanted a more modern feel, and the colors from the previous design were not very modern. However I realize now that this could be a big change for development to make and not necessarily a priority for a startup to update their entire brand colors.

3. Clarification on system limitations. At the time of design, I was unaware of the state of the backend development and of the current designs limitations. Since the company is a startup, resources are deployed in a way that might mean that there are limitations in available features, like with the ability to filter results with more than one filter.

4. Conduct usability testing. Since this was a design challenge, I didn't get the chance to run the design by real users to determine its weaknesses. I think feedback is extremely important in a redesign process to ensure resources are being effectively deployed and we aren't wasting time on a solution that doesn't address user needs well enough.

1. There are always going to be limitations on your design, and designing without taking these into account is a waste of resources.

2. Not all redesigns are feasible. It's not always going to be the case that you can completely change brand colors or overall a structure of a page. In some cases, there are limitations based on what users expect from already having used the product.

3. Design heuristics are very general but specific at the same time. A lot of design features can hit on multiple design heuristics at the same time, and in fact that is good if a design satisfies multiple design heuristics at once.

4. I'm getting really confident in using Axure! Great, robust software in general for wireframing and prototyping.